Duncan’s Economic Blog

What’s missing from the forecasts?

Posted in Uncategorized by duncanseconomicblog on September 3, 2009

About a month ago I set out my economic basecase on Labourlist. Whilst I try to avoid precise forecasts, which are likely to be wrong, I do think one can estimate broad trends. I wrote:

The current recession is nearing its end. Either this quarter, or most likely next (Q4), we will see GDP grow in the UK. However this growth is most likely to come from companies rebuilding inventories. Over the past 9 months there have been huge draw downs of stock across all sorts of sectors, as companies have simply halted production. With inventories so low, they will need to be rebuilt. A simple rebuilding of inventory could cause easily two quarters of positive growth.

The question is, what happens after that? This pick-up in activity will be accompanied by unemployment continuing to rise, albeit at a slower pace. Firms that are simply re-stocking are unlikely to hire many workers.

Private consumption is likely to remain weak for several years. Rising unemployment, less credit availability, higher savings from nervous individuals and higher taxes will prevent a strong retail recovery. Consumption will bump along near current levels for several years. There may be short term bounces but the trend looks clear.

Private sector investment is also unlikely to recover. Facing weak demand, why should firms invest in new plant and equipment? Even if they wanted to, credit is hard to come by. Capacity utilisation rates are at record lows across the West. As long as there is spare capacity, there will be little incentive to build more.

The banking situation is still difficult. Although the immediate crisis has past, the banks now face the long grind of non-performing loans rising as unemployment ticks higher and firms go to the wall. This will lead to yet more credit rationing.

So, what happens when the inventory re-stocking is completed – probably by this time next year? That depends on policy makers. I suspect that by this time next year, worried about the public finances and with two or three quarters of GDP growth under their belts, they will repeat the decision of 1937 and withdraw the stimulus. A Tory government would certainly go further and force through larger cuts.

If these cuts come before private sector GDP has found a firmer footing than only one outcome is possible. A ‘double dip’ back into recession by the end of 2011 then would then be almost inevitable.

I’m not really one of the green shoots brigade…

And what worries me now is that the green shoots brigade seem to have the upper hand.

The chart below shows forecasts for UK GDP growth in 2010 over the past year and a half. 

uk forecast

As can be seen, back in May 2008 the median forecast for 2010 growth was 2.5%.  By May this year that had fallen all the way down to about 0.3%. That was probably too low, but since then it has been revised up all the way to 1.3%. Some commentators (the greenline) are going for 1.8%. Even the most bearish analyst surveyed by Bloomberg has a forecast of 0.0%. No one now expects a recession next year.  Despite this the consensus for forecast for 2010 unemployment stands at 9.2%.

This morning’s FT contains a good article on ‘exit strategies’. I entirely agree:

To cope with this, markets are, as ever, focusing on what they can measure. In this case that is every utterance by a central banker. On Thursday it will be the turn of the European Central Bank.

But with this focus comes a danger that markets have not fully factored in the political part of any exit strategy, particularly the domestic pressures that might force countries into cutting their support.

Political actions are far harder to quantify than central bank actions but, as the last year has shown, terribly dangerous to underestimate.

I think it is ‘political action’ that is missing from the 2010 UK forecasts. If UK inventory re-stocking is complete by the end of Q1 next year and  if private domestic demand has not recovered, then it could be  ‘political action’ by an incoming Tory government (cutting spending) that causes growth to fall.


2 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Paul said, on September 3, 2009 at 10:02 am

    I think that political action to cut spending (by the Tories) had effectively started. Most obviously this is Tory councils (like mine) where cuts are being made as we speak despite decent reserves, with like-minded councils now trying to outdo each other on how drastic their cuts/service depletion can be (Barnet currently leading the pack).

    But the fact that DoH officials now feel empowered by the real prospect of a tory govt to appoint consultants who then advice massive cuts to jobs in the NHS is also revelatory, even as ministers reject the plans.

    The need to be seen to cut has gained dominance as the key indicator of a prospective govt.’s financial competence (cf Phil Hammond intereview in which he displays pride at being the new enforcer), taking over from previous key indicators – unemployment levels and inflation.

  2. charliemarks said, on September 4, 2009 at 10:11 pm

    For sure. Ridley’s dream of local councils meeting once a year to vote on which private companies to give contracts, this remains the goal of the Tory party.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: